Shortcut Learning Detector
Compare a clinical model, a metadata-only model, and a within-site label-shuffle control to detect whether a classifier is exploiting acquisition shortcuts.
- shortcut learning
- confounding
- negative control
- site effects
Clinical model AUC
0.733
Metadata-only AUC
0.687
Shuffled-label AUC
0.687
Metadata-only predictions by site
Site ASite B
Verdict
Metadata-only beats chance, and so does the shuffled-label control: the model is overfitting to site noise, not detecting a real shortcut signal.